Monthly Archives: December 2009

Happy New Year (Not to You, Aurora Loan Services)

Happy New Year (Not to You, Aurora Loan Services)
Happy New Year and wish me a happy anniversary, too.  I'm celebrating the first anniversary of my effort to modify my mortgage through Aurora Loan Services. You are going to see a lot of this post in the near future, because I'm going to cross-post it everywhere until I find someone who knows someone in Aurora Loan Services or its regulator. I've never wanted to bring a company down before, but I do now. I wasn't quite angry enough until today, when I read an article in the Times that told me I was not an isolated  case, but an example of a widespread and toxic policy on the part of this particular servicer to deny homeowners programs the government has sought to extend. Failing to extend these programs helps no one except Aurora itself.

Background: It all started in 2008, when Lehmann Brothers collapsed.  Aurora is a unit of Lehmann. Right after that came the collapse of Bear Stearns, and then the disappearance of all my investments, my real estate deals, and my consulting clients.

Ooops! Those were supposed to be my retirement. No matter.  I'm not in a hurry to retire. But I didn't have any cash flow all of a sudden.

The first time I called Aurora, I thought they'd say yes to modification, because I had no income for November and December 2008
But they said no, because they said I couldn't afford the house.

Then came Obama's Making Home Affordable Program.
I applied, and Aurora said no, because I wasn't a Fannie and Freddie mortgage. Nothing in the Bay Area is a Fannie and Freddie Mortgage. We pay the big bucks here for a 1500 square foot house that would cost $150k anywhere else in the country. Here, in 2005, my house cost $769,000. I could afford it. I documented it with tax returns. I'm not stupid, and my loan is not subprime,  However, the world has changed, and with it, the value of my house.

Aurora bought my first mortgage from Princeton Capital, and probably tore it into a million little pieces. Citibank has my HELOC. You couldn't get JUST a mortgage in northern California in 2005; you had to buy a house with a mortgage and a HELOC. My 30-year old house is a starter home in my community, not a McMansion. It was where I wanted to retire, because my kids live here.

Want to know what it's worth now? Mint says $511k. But let's not talk about that. I don't want to sell it.  I want to own it. And I couldn't sell it anyway.  In my neighborhood, houses don't sell anymore unless they are foreclosed.

I waited a while, following the news, and then, because Obama had put out some new programs, I applied again. This time I spoke to someone on the phone who told me my business didn't break even so I wasn't eligible. She explained that I had to break even and could then re-apply..

I waited three more months. All this time I paid out of savings and lines of credit while the value of the house dropped. Obama came into office with the audacity of hope, and yet another a new program had me apply again.

This time they lost my information. And, oh by the way, I kept on paying. And I kept on working. In May, I broke even.

I applied again. They lost my information again. I re-sent it again.

I have a system by now for assembling stuff.  My last two years' tax returns and last two months' financial statements and bank statements, along with my hardship letter, are in a folder on my desktop. I update my age in the hardship letter. I update the statements every month of so. And I fire off the package again

Now they have an automated email system that tells me they have my materials.  They also tell me it takes 90 days to get an answer. In 90 days I get another letter in response to my inquiries that says my materials are out of date again. In July, re-submitted.  In October they told me they didn't have an snwer yet. In November I told them to hurry. They sent me another email referring me to yet another program.

I have now been through the Making Home Affordable Program, the Home Retention Program, and the Mortgage Modification Program.

For the mortgage modification program, I was told last week that I am not eligible.  Why?  Because I have $22,000 left in savings, which they say is enough tfor three months of mortgage payments. Having this much money (my mortgage is nearly $5000 a month) makes me ineligible.

But the helpful cheery voice said,  "please call us back again.  In a few months, you may qualify." When?  When I have eaten up the very last of my savings? And then they will tell me I don't qualify because I don't have any savings?

Why don't I just keep paying for thirty years? Because I have an adjustable mortgage, and when it adjusts I will not be able to refinance the loan because the house has no equity. It will be a numbers game, and I will lose the house whether I've been paying or not.

Help me out by forwarding this to anyone you know, anywhere. I want to call these people out for what they're doing. It's not the house, and it's not the money — it's the principle.  I will never be in the street. I will never starve.  But other people will, like the four homeowners from Queens in the NY Time story. They're not writers, though, and I am. Perhaps I can use my pen, supposedly mightier than the sword, to help us all.

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

Telling off Janet Napolitano (who is, by the way, an old friend)

Telling off Janet Napolitano (who is, by the way, an old friend)
</object>

Why inconvenience millions when you can just put a single person on a don't fly list? It's backwards. Send this around if you agree.

Francine Hardaway, Ph.D, Stealthmode Partners
http://blog.stealthmode.com
http://twitter.com/hardaway
http://www.linkedin.com/in/francinehardaway

"The stumble throws us forward."

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

Merry Christmas, Citibank

Merry Christmas, Citibank

Maybe you will be smarter in 2010 than you are in 2009. This year,
during the worst financial times of my adult life, I managed to pay
off all your cards (three) and asked for my interest on the oldest
one, the American Airlines Platinum, to be reduced from 29.99%
interest to something reasonable. I never understood why you raised it
in the first place, since I never paid late or defaulted, except that
you were having more trouble that I was and wanted to protect your
bonuses and your “shareholder value.”

Oh, and your lobbyists own the Congress, so you thought you would
raise it before the regulations went into effect. In short, your
small print, transparent papered correspondence to me basically said
you raised it BECAUSE YOU COULD.

In a secure email, you said no, that the card was currently in
default. I looked, and sure enough, I had a $.50 balance. I’m not
sure where that even came from, because I paid the entire card off
months ago. You probably charged me a fee for responding to my email.

Do you really want me to send you a check for $.50? I have a $10
credit on one of my other cards, and you could just help me by
transferring $.50 to that account. Also, I try to zero these cards
out every month, I never use them; yet they still come out with fees
that put me in the default status because I think the bills are paid
since I don’t use the cards. Then they have these little balances on
them that I never see.

In the spirit of Christmas, how can we fix this? If I close the
accounts, you ding my credit. If I use the cards you ding my credit.
You are the only people charging me 29.9% interest, which is why I
never use your cards. Is that what you want? Does that serve you any
better than it serves me? Use your head. Be a little more tolerant
and you will get more business, not less.

Merry Christmas. Perhaps a moment of contemplation is in order for
you before the new year.

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

What’s Coming Next? 2010 and Beyond

What’s Coming Next? 2010 and Beyond

Friends, Family and Colleagues,

Happy Holidays. Having spent the last week with a one-year-old and watched him
actually take his first steps, I’m totally focused on the future. If you know me
at all, you know I am an optimist and a pragmatist: I always think we have some
ability either to make things better or to come to a greater understanding of
things as they are.

I woke up this morning to watch the Senate vote on the health care reform bill.
No, it’s not the bill I wanted. And it’s not the bill most of you wanted. It’s
probably not the bill almost anyone wanted — except people who have been
totally locked out of health insurance because they have pre-existing
conditions.

Those people got help. And that’s a big deal. Most pre-existing conditions are
chronic and serious, so we are on the way to helping some of the most vulnerable
among us. Forget the bargains, the tradeoffs, the earmarks, the hidden taxes,
the lack of cost control, and the fact that Washington is institutionally
corrupt. Some people will get help. So it’s not all bad.

Now. Get over it. On to the next event.

The next event is an economy that supports people. Government can’t give that to
us. It can only back off and let us give it to ourselves. If you are looking to
do something to help the economy, consider the following resolutions in 2010:

1) Start something. A business, a non-profit, a service. Do it yourself, and
own it fully. Even if you are only selling the brownies you bake at home, do it.
The only difference between you and Larry Page/Sergey Brin is that they started
something because they thought they could. Or they were too young and dumb to
think they couldn’t. You would be surprised how the market greets new offerings.

2)Become an angel. If you don’t want to run a business yourself, lend money or
invest in someone who does. Too many of us with modest means sit back and bitch
about the stock market and the real estate market. Well, get out. Don’t be
passive. Put your money and your effort where your passion is. I’ve got
companies who need as little as $5000 or $25,000 to get off the ground. Banks
aren’t lending. Why don’t you? Why do you think developing companies are
developing while we stagnate? It’s because people lend small amounts of money to
each other in those countries — outside the corrupt banking system.

3)Take care of yourself and your family. Reduce your dependence on the health
care system, the banking system, the legal system. Barter and trade with
friends. Be a part of a trust network. Accept the fact that the government takes
all our money and sends it off to wars we don’t want, and move on. Other
governments do the same thing. When I was a kid, my father’s tax rate was 90%.
So what? We still had 10% left, and I never heard my dad complain.

4)If you really want to change the system, get involved in one of the many
movements on both sides: the tea party movement, which is largely aimed at the
tax code; the gay rights movement, which is trying to get same-sex marriage
legalized; the Change Congress movement, which is trying to get rid of lobbyists
and campaigns financed by corporations; the transparency in government movement.

More pointedly: do something, anything that suits you. Don’t just sit back and
bitch. In the past few months, I’ve heard all the Monday morning quarterbacking
i can stand from people on the left and the right who hate Obama. Well, guess
what? Obama uprooted his family and ran for office. He got elected and spent a
year cleaning up various messes and failing to clean up others, sleeping in
strange beds and fearing assassination. I’m sure he learned a lot, and I’m sure
on some days he wished he had never run. (I bet Michelle wishes that every day).
Yeah, his presidency might be a failure. And some businesses might be failures.
And Bill Gates’ effort to eradicate AIDS might be a failure.

But at least they try.

Season’s Greetings and a big smile to you from Baby Dashie and his five teeth.

Francine Hardaway, Ph.D, Stealthmode Partners
http://blog.stealthmode.com
http://twitter.com/hardaway
http://www.linkedin.com/in/francinehardaway

“The stumble throws us forward.”

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

Dash’s First Steps

Dash’s First Steps

Download now or watch on posterous

IMG_0006.mov (1358 KB)

Posted via web from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

Best Online Experiences of 2009

Best Online Experiences of 2009

I'm really too undisciplined to make a good top 10 list, but here I go anyway (I have no shame).  I spend so much time online that I should be able to make several lists: one for productivity apps, one for entertainment apps, and yet another one for social apps, but I don't.  Instead, I barfed up one, big mixed-up list that consists of things I loved about my time online in 2009.

1.The Gillmor Gang
Every Saturday morning when I got on the elliptical cross trainer I laughed out loud listening to The GIllmor Gang, which is usually recorded on Thursday. The cranky geeks who assemble for a weekly grilling by the visionary and ascerbic Steve Gillmor
can include, Kevin Marks, Robert Scoble, Dan Farber,  Mike Arrington, and anyone else in the neighborhood, which last week was Paris. Now that, after six years, they've finally learned how to work with live media, the show is a very deep discussion of living life in the real time stream. However, I should warn you that the show sometimes inexplicably disappears from the air for months. You'll need to do your own research to find out why:-)

I got addicted to this show very quickly because I love people like me who help startups. Jason Calcanis puts his heart and soul into talking to the entrepreneurs, and hasn't skimped on the production values, either. The startup callers are screened well (I haven't heard any total losers), and Jason gives real help (in addition to free tickets to Tech Crunch 50 and other expensive conferences). He also invites first rate guests to help him advise the callers. Add in the occasional "Insights from Tyler," Jason's assistant, and Lon reading the news, and things are never dull, even when the show runs over two hours.

This Twitter client, which started out as a video conversation tool, keeps listening to its users and iterating according to their wishes. Of all the beta test teams I've been on, this is the only one that appears to have a true capacity to take user feedback seriously and turn it back to us as features we want. Time and time again I've tried another Twitter client and was drawn back to Seesmic by new features. I'm pretty tired of switching, so I think I'll stick.

Steve Rubel made me eat my words about this dead simple way to aggregate my considerable online life. I thought I had reached Nirvana when I moved my blog to WordPress.org, but nine out of ten blog posts, including this one, are now composed on Posterous. It's just too easy to upload everything to one place by email, and then just tell it where to go: Flickr, WordPress, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook,– almost anywhere else you wish.

This is the year Medicare finally let me have my own records online as part of a pilot program they are trying out in Arizona.  Of course they couldn't get a lot of people to participate, but I have been overjoyed.  My pharmacy, my doctor, and my lab are finally all included, and all my records are in one place.  I've shared the password to my records with my kids and a friend, so if anything happens to me, even if it's in India, the person who has to treat me will know something about me even if I'm incapacitated.

It took me a while, but all my bank accounts, investments, and loans are aggregated on Mint. I started using it right after it started, and this will be the first year I have a good way to get my taxes into Turbotax. Because I'm on a Mac, Quicken and Quickbooks never did it for me. When Quicken acquired Mint, the Mint founder said he'd replace Quicken in six months, and for me he already has.

7. TWIT.tv  I love Leo's whole network, but two shows are favorites.  This Week in Tech, a weekly tech news show, airs on audio and video on Sunday afternoons and is a never-miss for me, especially after last week when Leo LaPorte got his mother involved in his discussion with John C. Dvorak  about Facebook privacy issues. She didn't know she was on the program, and she acknowledged her crush on John. While these are also cranky geeks, they are very knowledgeable about issues over a three-decade time span, and Leo has a wonderful radio voice. 

8. Also on TWIT.tv is This Week in Google, where Gina Tripani, Leo, and Jeff Jarvis discuss all things Cloud-related. From Gina, I've learned everything about Google Wave, and from Jeff I've learned what's happening in the media business. Making the show about the Cloud, instead of just Google, makes it fair game to discuss everything from citizen journalism to online identity.

9.Freshbooks has become my billing software this year.  Between my bank, Freshbooks and Mint, I never have my data on my hard drive anymore.  Do you think that's dangerous? So do I, but I suspect that among the three of them, at least one will survive, not be hacked, and remain free, and I will have access to my data. Maybe the next great opportunity is an aggregator for financial data that's spread all over the cloud.

10. Clicker. This is perhaps the newest of my fave-raves. It is my online TV Guide.  It locates all episodes of TV shows you want to see, so you can find them online and see them. Since I never watch TV in real time anymore, or on the TV (which I use mainly as a news ticker service while I work), I think Clicker's brilliant. Clicker would have been totally unnecessary a few years ago, but now it is nearly mandatory if you want to conveniently locate online video.

Notice that Twitter and Facebook, both of which are becoming more trouble than they may be worth, and poor, dying Friendfeed, are left out of the list. Perhaps because they aren't fun anymore, perhaps because they've graduated to being utilities, I couldn't get them into the top ten. Nor is any news site in my top ten. Just goes to show you….

And here's your bonus:  Dave Winer. I know he's not an online app per se, but I'm following Scripting.com, RebootingtheNews.com,  RSS Cloud and many other initiatives in which he's engaged and I find them fascinating.

.

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

Did we Really Get Health Care Reform Today?

Did we Really Get Health Care Reform Today?
Remember me?  I'm the person who has been arguing that any bill is better than no bill at all, and that we have to start somewhere on reform. That doesn't mean I can't have mixed feelings about this particular piece of legislation, or that I can't see it as part of a bigger, sicker picture of our nation.   Not only did I listen to Bill Moyers' Journal last night, on which he had Matt Taiibi and Robert Kuttner, but I saw the Democrats patting themselves on the back on CNN, after they made the last great compromise on abortion language to pull over Ben Nelson. What sacrifice of women's health did we make?  I don't even know. Do you?
Not arguing with any of Karoli's points in  her health care history lesson, either. Obama took his plays from Clinton's play book; if Clinton did it, Obama wouldn't, because Clinton failed. I'm not against the reform, but I am against the fact that a deal was made before the discussion even began, which means single payer was never on the table, and any re-pricing of drugs was never on the table. The big costs in health care, outside of those from waste and fraud, are non-standard billing and clinical systems due to multiple insurance companies, non-standard non-outcomes based clinical practice, and the approval of prescription drugs that aren't effective and are costly to produce and sometimes even unsafe. We didn't fix any of that. 
Instead, we will hand the insurance companies 30,000,000 new customers that they can overcharge, knowing our tax money will pay for them. We have asked nothing from the insurance companies, and nothing from pharma. 

What will we get in exchange? We will get pre-existing conditions allowed. And Obama will lose big in the next election, because his failure to step up and be transformative in a time of crisis will embolden movements like the Tea Partiers. Everyone in middle America now knows the fix is in. This isn't "change." This is the party of the people giving in to the same big money interests that the Republicans do.

The difference between Clinton's and Obama's times in office is that we are now in a fiscal crisis. We weren't then.  Then, we didn't have nearly as many uninsured, and we didn't have to contend with the jobless recovery. I maintain that it was wrong to just use history as a guide. In a crisis, you can be more aggressive. But we haven't been. Watch what happens to the taxes and the deficit when we start subsidizing health care that insurance companies don't have to cut costs on. 

I tend to see a bigger picture than just #hcr. I think I am seeing the future of a corrupt country rule by money instead of a desire for independence, greed instead of compassion. And because I read economics as well as health care, I see us heading off a cliff. Unless the tax on medical devices is high enough to support the cost of reform.

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

Imaging and Health Care Costs

Imaging and Health Care Costs

Next time you go to a doctor and she sends you for X-rays, scans, or an MRI, give some thought to it before you go. My late husband, a radiologist whose wisdom constantly returns to me during the debate on health care reform, used to say "don't let anyone do an MRI on your back unless you are willing to have surgery. And don't let anybody operate on your back. Most back surgeries don't work." I thought he was being funny, but he knew from all his years of observation what was about to happen in health care.

Indeed, his twelve-year old opinion has now been validated by a host of studies saying that the growth of high tech medical imaging, which was just beginning when he died, has contributed to high health care costs not only because it is expensive itself, but because it leads to significant instances of over treatment that are difficult to back away from although costly and even dangerous. That's why the Prevention Task Force made it's recommendations about mammograms for women 40-50, and why the recommendations were so loudly decried.

In my own case, my husband gave me a mammogram and a spine X-ray when I was just past 50 (I had been in a car accident), and when I got dressed, he asked me to come into his office, where he had my films on a light wall (yes, these were the days of films). He sounded so worried that I thought he had found breast cancer. But no, he looked away my chest to my spine, and said "you have the worst degenerative disc disease I have seen in a long time!"

I said, "but nothing hurts," to which he replied,"it will." And then I asked what to do when it began to hurt, and he told me that if I could stand the pain it would fuse by itself.

It's a good thing I asked, because a couple of years later,  he died of cancer, probably precipitated by too much exposure to radiation during his career, when the machines were less carefully calibrated. And one morning I couldn't stand up straight when I got out of bed, my back hurt so bad.

After a week I went to a neurosurgeon, a very famous one. I was in such pain that I was laying on the floor of his office. He came in to give me the results of the MRI he had made me have. "You will need a spinal fusion," he told me, "or you will be in a wheelchair or lose bowel and bladder control." I was scared to death.  Gerry was dead, and this guy was one of the top neuros in the nation. But I remembered what Gerry said. "Don't let anybody operate on your back. Back surgeries don't work." Too bad I had weakened and said "yes" to the MRI.

I left the office in a panic, but fortunately found my way through a trainer to a yoga studio. And I lived happily ever after for the next fifteen years. No surgery, no drugs, no back pain, no wheelchair, no incontinence. Along the way, my friends have had botched back surgeries, back surgeries from which they got nearly fatal infections, and surgeries that worked for a few years and then led to more surgeries.

I'm not saying no one should have an MRI, or no one should have surgery. But doctors now rely on high tech imaging where they used to rely on many other things: last week I went to a doctor whose apprentice couldn't even listen through a stethoscope to my heart and lungs.  When that guy gets into practice, he will cover his inexperience by sending me for X-rays and cardiograms I may not need, but that will cost Medicare and make his job easier till he learns to listen.

We can bankrupt the whole country demanding high tech health care, or we can learn to listen better and take care of ourselves. And we can learn what people did before all this stuff — yoga, nutrition, herbs, and exercise.

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify

Underground Economy: Cybercrime on the Internet

Underground Economy: Cybercrime on the Internet

Over a fancy lunch today in a Scottsdale, AZ restaurant filled with other people’s office Christmas parties, I heard a hair-raising presentation about an Underground Economy of organized criminals and cybercrime on the internet.

The speaker, the owner of Packet Forensics, a company started in 2002 to provide dedicated equipment for cyber-surveillance to telecom companies, ISPs, governments, and law enforcement, is an expert in cybercrime who probably realized a market need after 9/11.

But the long and short of it is that cybercrime started long before that. In fact, it probably started with the law firm of Cantor and Siegel in Phoenix, which in the early days of the internet spammed usenet groups to encourage people to apply for green cards through its law firm. That was the beginning of spam.
By 1997, spammers were using Internet Relay Chat channels to trade software hacks. The hacks were often created by kids who were paid in bicycles, computers, and other small items for their work.

The turn of the new century saw the first use of bots and DDOS attacks on sites like Amazon and EBay around Christmas, and by 2002 spammers had discovered that hackers could sell them bots to automate their efforts.

Organized crime, in the form of the Russian mafia, entered the spamming world in 2003, and quickly organized cyber criminals in nations like Estonia, Georgia, and Kyrzgyzstan, where cyberattacks were part of a plan to force a political agenda

Although spam, organized crime’s first venture, doesn’t seem too harmful right now, by comparison, cyber crimes can melt down entire systems (power generators), and phishing scams steal $2.2 trillion annually according to Interpol.

The underground economy of organized crime on the internet mirrors how business is done in the “real world.” Underground, criminals sell both products and services: they sell lessons in hacking, knowledge and information, passwords, and credit card information. A single criminal stole $170 million in credit card records from TJ Maxx; twelve million account transactions were sniffed from Dave & Buster’s restaurant chain. [Update: the TJ Maxx thief was apprehended.]

Criminals also sell appliances, drugs, guns, and passports on web sites, IRC channels, IM and jabberLive sites.

The talk got worse when the speaker began to show us live sites and the activity occurring on them in real time. One site, Unknown.ws (do not click on this, because your visit will be logged forever more) hosts online forums that are like matchmaking services. Hackers advertise such products as credit card information in various formats. In one, a guy sells “dumps” — which are copies of all the information you have on your credit card. The price of the average credit card record has fallen in the forums to $10 a record ($40 for Amex cards), and they are sold in bulk. Sophisticated purveyors of information give free samples, and illustrations. They’re just the hackers, after all; they don’t use the cards to buy anything after they steal the information, so they face a very low level of risk. Today we also saw eBay and PayPal information going for $6.00 a record.

These sellers of this information can’t be tracked down in the event that identity theft occurs, because there are 35,000 users in this forum and you don’t know which one did it. The records are sold by a hacker for small amounts of money, but the Russian Mafia people who buy it make the big bucks.

Like most of the internet, the underground economy has a highly evolved reputation and trust network underground. There is, indeed, honor among thieves, as Packet Forensics has discovered by intercepting the private DMs and iMs of these people. They often use have their own payment system Webmoney , which is like a Paypal alternative.

The speaker showed us a brisk trade in malware and Trojans, most developed in Delphi or Visual Basic.The sellers have official return policies, just like any other sellers. Other products for sale include ATM skimmers (you put them on an ATM machine, they can’t be detected by users, and they collect the data from every card using the machine) that can upload information wirelessly, fake Amex and Citicard blanks that can be printed with your own embossing machine, and other hacker tools like “packers,” pieces of code that prevent anti-virus software from detecting malicious code.

What’s the effect of all this cybercrime: it’s simple.These criminals are wiping out major financial institutions one transaction at a time.

The most dangerous way they are doing it isn’t by selling your information. That affects mostly individuals. But to affect businesses, they use ACH fraud.

With this “little” technique, criminals compromise your business bank account and transfer your next payroll money out at 4:55PM when you’re not likely to notice it’s gone. They transfer the money to a phony company account at another bank. A clearing house, ACH, clears the transaction overnight, so it appears in the phony account at 9AM the next morning.

They then use this phony company to employ people to “work from home” accepting wire transfers and sending them to other fake companies by Western Union. Each “employee” only transfers a sum under $10,000 so it doesn’t get caught by the IRS or the banking rules.

By the time you find out the next morning that the money’s gone from your account, it has been cut into less-than-$10,000 pieces and transferred at least twice. That makes it almost impossible for your bank to retrieve.

This gambit started only about ten months ago, and many banks just self-insure eat the money when they find out it is gone, because you are a good customer and they don’t want to lose you. But then the fraudster does it again, small banks can’t afford to eat it. In Bullitt County, KY, the school district lost $415,000 in funds before the fraud was detected; it was perpetrated by criminals in the Ukraine . Read the link to Brian Krebs’ Washington Post story.

“the trouble began on June 22, when someone started making unauthorized wire transfers of $10,000 or less from the county’s payroll to accounts belonging to at least 25 individuals around the country (some individuals received multiple payments). On June 29, the county’s bank realized something was wrong, and began requesting that the banks receiving those transfers start reversing them, Sholar said.

‘Our bank told us they would know by Thursday how many of those transactions would be able to be reversed,” Sholar said. ‘They told us they thought we would get some of the money back, they just weren’t sure how much.’”

That’s because, although individuals have 30 days to question or dispute a bank transaction, businesses have only 24 hours.

Here’s your takeaway from all of this: 1)get a service like Lifelock . Although Lifelock doesn’t do anything fancy, it takes care of things most consumers don’t spend the time to do themselves. And tell your bank not to let any money be automatically wired out of your account unless the recipient is on a list you have provided the bank.

And show some respect for the Underground Economy. It’s better than the AboveGround Economy right now.

Amplify

Ten Things to Consider about Facebook Privacy Issues

Ten Things to Consider about Facebook Privacy Issues

For the past few days, I've been reading about Facebook's new privacy settings. I've got mixed feelings about them, but on balance I believe  the ultimate tradeoff of privacy for information as a good thing. I also believe it's an unstoppable thing, no matter what the ACLU and EFF say. So we have to coalesce our thoughts around this new shift in our lives. Here are some things to consider as you accept Facebook's suggested settings, which  most everyone will by default.

1) It's all about who you friend. There are certain settings that are defaulted to "friends of friends." These, IMHO are the interesting ones. While you may now be in college and the friends of your friends are your classmates or the girls in another sorority, later on they might be pretty unsavory, those folks at two removes. Sometimes our classmates grow up to be porn stars, Bernie Madoffs, or investigative reporters. Ten years from now is when the danger appears, because information on the internet never dies, even if you wish you did.

2) Facebook is about them, not about you. Just as many unsuspecting teens thought Tom really was their friend on MySpace until he got booted, today's Facebook users identify with the uncomfortable-in-public, shy Mark Zuckerberg.  But don't be fooled. Facebook is going to go public or get sold or something, and the value in the company is going to be the use of the information it has been collecting about all of us. It's not just a matter of putting ads against that information, either.

3)What generation are you in? That's a big determiner of how much privacy you need and want. If you are my age, your life can easily be lived in the open, because you are not looking for a husband (wife) or a job. Seniors have a lot of freedom to reveal things, because they have to impress no one.  And seniors are a fast=growing group on Facebook. But teens often want privacy from parents and grandparents, and Gen X doesn't want to distress a future employer, especially in this market.

3)On the other hand, most younger people I know have grown up on the internet and don't see privacy as any great desirable thing. They are in the habit of sharing information. Privacy suddenly gets more desirable when you grow up to be Tiger Woods, however, and that's difficult to predict.

4)Your information is everywhere anyway . The data trade is the hallmark of the "Information Economy." Behind every service you use, from Google to Facebook to the Department of Motor Vehicles, there is an industrial database where your information is aggregated and sold, either with or without your name attached. Blind data is used by marketers, researchers, and criminals,

5) There are really good reasons to give up your privacy. Ask anyone with a serious illness about which not everything is known.  These people are hunting all over the internet for people who are willing to share their experiences with similar conditions.  In fact, ther'es one drug interaction  site, i-Guard, that has aggregated so much shared information on side effects that its information is used by drug companies to monitor the after-market performance of their products.

6) The push toward opening walled gardens of data is overwhelming. This is a complicated issue, but information really does want to be free, and that doesn't mean you can't charge for it.  In fact, the "free-est" (i.e. most complete) data is the most valuable. To everyone. Even to you. When you get into a relationship or take a job, don't you want to know as much as possible about the situation you are getting into? If the company hides from you that it has only three months of runway when it hires you, don't you feel cheated. Just as you feel when you learn that your husband is having not one, but eleven affairs?

7) Confession is as natural as deception. As humans, we are pulled by both the need to confess and the need to keep certain things private. And that's a very individual decision, just like some people pee with the bathroom door open at home, and some cannot. These are the negotiations you have with someone when you live with them.

8) The internet is a mirror of the human race. We created the internet, and it's a reflection of us, our needs, and our paradoxes and ambiguities. To some degree, we can control our privacy choices on the internet, but basically the best way to control them is never to give out the information in the first place. This is the premise behind closeted gays and people in the witness protection program. But life is limited and impoverished by too many choices in favor of privacy.  I know that's very philosophical, but it's appropriate here.
 
9) Information in the wrong hands can be very dangerous to those around you. People have been tortured and blackmailed by people who have information about them. David Letterman's an example. But what did he do? He removed the information's power over him by making it public.

10) But the free flow of information can also bring freedom and power. Only when their exploits were revealed did the horrible conditions at Abu Grahib come to an end. Same thing with Viet Nam and Guantanamo. Light finds dirt.

These are the things I think about as I contemplate what Facebook is heading for — openness. These are very, very important issues that most of the 350 million users don't think about. Are you thinking about any others?

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Amplify