Monthly Archives: May 2011

What is a Pivot, and Does Your Startup Need One?

What is a Pivot, and Does Your Startup Need One?
What is a Pivot, and Does Your Startup Need One?

There’s a new vocabulary around entrepreneurship this year: it’s from the Lean Startup movement, and it is centered around making effective use of resources to reduce the chance of failure. Started by Eric Ries, it has captivated not only Silicon Valley, but startups worldwide.

The principles of the Lean Startup are nothing new, but they often seem novel to the engineers who design today’s products. The engineer looks to finish or improve the product, forgetting that the most important part of a business is not the product, but the customer. Without the customer, there simply is no business and actually not much point in improving the product.  It’s the old idea of features (what the product can do) v. benefits (what the customer needs). Customers pay for benefits, not features.

My friend Dave McClure has put it down this way in his Startup Metrics for Pirates:

 

So the guiding principle of the Lean Startup movement is to get to market as quickly as possible with a minimum viable product (MVP), measure the response of customers through customer development, iterate quickly, and if you don’t see a sustainable business in the offing, PIVOT. Everybody in business has now adopted this term.

This term pivot has come to mean many things. It’s probably a good idea at this point to do a re-set on it.

What pivot doesn’t mean is abandon your idea or your vision. What it MAY mean is change your business model.

I can illustrate this through a client of ours, Jimdo. Jimdo started before the Lean Startup hype began. Therefore, whatever moves the company made were made intuitively and organically. Jimdo wasn’t following Eric’s rules, and they weren’t even in Silicon Valley; in fact they were on a pig farm in Germany. But they came to the same place the Lean Startup movement begins: listen to the customer to make a product someone will buy. This, after all, is what builds a sustainable business.

 

Jimdo started as NorthClick,  three co-founders who wanted to build simple web pages for businesses.  After a short stint on the farm, they won a business plan competition, which gave them $20,000 with which to move to Hamburg and get an office.

Soon, friends were asking them if they could use the company’s technology for personal web pages. Clearly, the core techology was already quite good and easy to use. People were asking to become customers, even if they weren’t the people the founders expected.. And here was the pivot:

Over time, more and more of our friends asked us whether they could use our system for personal sites. We were really excited by the cool sites they created! Some used the system for pages about themselves, three guys used it to document their sailing trip from Germany to Sydney, Australia, some used their websites to promote their bands…and the feedback was just unbelievable!

That’s when the idea was born to give away what you now know as Jimdo. Simply put – Pages to the People!

The change was in the business model, not in the vision or the technology. By listening to people who wanted to become their customers, they found their “product/market fit”: the spot where their product hit an already-existing market. Jimdo now uses a “freemium” business model, in which entry level pages are free. That’s what customers wanted. And that’s how Jimdo actually got to revenue.

Once you have found the market, it’s easy to go after funding, because you don’t have to convince investors that your product has a market. You are asking for money to scale, and the risk is much lower for the investor. Jimdo  raised one round of funding, which brought it to profitability.

Now, with 4,000,000 global users, Jimdo still keeps a close watch on what customers want, releasing features that make sense: an integration with DropBox for areas where bandwidth for uploading images and video is limited, and a mobile interface.

 

 




Amplify

Twitter for Seniors

Twitter for Seniors

This weekend I got an email from a mailing list I’m on that is made up of retired  old men who eat lunch together once a week and discuss politics, current affairs, and other important topics. They are, on average, very smart, pretty wealthy, and well-travelled. But social media has baffled them, and when one of the smartest sent an email deriding Twitter in the usual way: “who cares what Lady Gaga had for lunch,” I felt compelled to respond.

As someone your age who has been active on Twitter since late 2006, I can say with authority that Twitter is not what you think it is.

Twitter does not exist to tell you what someone you know had for lunch. Twitter is a handy way to break news, share knowledge, and refer people to longer form communications.

I do not follow Lady Gaga, nor does she follow me. However, 6800 people DO follow me, and they don’t want to know what I had for lunch. What they want to know is some variant of:

1) what has she read that I’d like to read, or

2) how does she feel about a certain event, or

3) what is her response to a common situation

4) When she comes to  NYC, where should we meet.

As an example, I am going to attach a screenshot of my own recent tweetstream.  This was me Friday, livestreaming from the Pitch Day for AZDisruptors, a new incubator in Scottsdale for tech companies. I was trying to tell people who weren’t there what kind of  company pitches I was seeing:

If you couldn’t make it to the event, but wanted to know what was happening, you could have followed me, and also everyone else tweeting with the hashtag #AZDisrupt. A hashtag is a convenient way to extract valuable information on a certain subject from the stream that floats by on Twitter. For example, if you were, indeed, interested in what people were thinking about lunch, you might do a twitter search for the hashtag #lunch.

At the bottom of the stream, you will see three tweets with green in the upper left hand corner.  Those are someone else’s tweets that I thought were worth sharing. Henry Blodget, who was a banker during Web 1.0 and was disgraced, is the founder of a tech publication called “Silicon Alley Insider,” and his interview with Steve Blank is of interest to my friends.  They might not have seen it, so i “retweeted” it into my stream. That amplified it and sent it to a group of people who may not follow Henry Blodget.

 

And here’s a little marketing FastCompany did yesterday for an article of mine:

 

 

Among the people I do follow:

Paul Kedrosky (economist)

Barry Rithotz (stock market guy and founder of The Big Picture blog, to which John Mauldin and others post)

Patrick LaForge, the managing editor of the New York Times, who posts breaking news

Andy Carvin from NPR who curates news from the Arab spring because he follows people in the Middle East and re-tweets them (which was how I followed Egypt and am now following Syria)

@shakirhusain, a friend who owns a software company in Pakistan and leads me to information about Pakistanis’ opinion of the US

@MayoClinic, which tweets high quality medical news

@kevinMD, a doctor blogger who talks about health care poliicy

–a raft of tech journalists

–friends in NYC who I want to see when I arrive next week and with whom I am making lunch plans on Twitter (you know who you are)

@whymommy, a planetary scientist who has inflammatory breast cancer and blogs about how hard it is to be a mother, a cancer survivor, and a scientist.

And about 1600 other intelligent well-informed souls who share information with me. Many of these people I “met” on Twitter, which has enlarged my knowledge base exponentially. I find Twitter to be a source of breaking news (how I learned about the earthquake in Japan), a community I can call upon in times of need (does anyone know how to spin up a server on Amazon’s cloud), a group of ad hoc reviewers (who has tried the new Thai restaurant in Scottsdale), and a source of ideas:

 

There is an entire group on Twitter who tweet about the stock market and have lots of information. A friend of mine named Howard Llndzon started a company called StockTwits. to aggregate the collective wisdom of all their twitter feeds. They use this information to trade more intelligently. It’s the wisdom of the crowd, or crowd sourcing. All tweets about stocks are tagged $$: ex AAPL$$

This allows you to pull Apple news out of Twitter, or new about any other stock.

 

Notice that the tweets contain links. The links are where the real information is, but you would never find it without the tweet that sends you there.

 

Now, could I follow Lady Gaga? Of course. I do follow Ashton Kucher, for instance. But most of what I see in my “tweetstream” comes from journalists like Anderson Cooper or Dylan Ratigan or Andrew Ross Sorkin, friends, experts, and the occasional politician. I follow @KarlRove. At important times, I may include more politicians temporarily, so I can find out what’s going on in Congress, because they all tweet from the floor of the House and Senate. Barack Obama does not write or send his own tweets,  his staff does, and they are ways of communicating what he is doing or going to do, so the tweets will tell you if there’s a major speech coming, or a trip to see victims of a disaster.  These are not terribly interesting to me, but I think they are a way of ensuring I don’t miss out.

 

I have two other Twitter accounts besides my main account, @hardaway. One is @azentrepreneurs, and I use it to follow local news, local entrepreneurs, and local events pertaining to entrepreneurs. It’s pretty “pure” of anything else. And I have one called @ushealthcrisis which follows only health care providers and policy experts. From that account I tweet health care information.

 

This is probably far more than you wanted to know, but far less than you need to know if you want to be an informed citizen, because more and more news and information passes through Twitter. I suggest you start by opening an account at Twitter.com and picking your three favorite journalists, financial gurus, or health care experts.  Use the search function to find them. Then follow them. You will be surprised at what you have been missing. Feel free to follow me, but my stream is very noisy because I use Twitter for so many things.

 

But the cool thing about Twitter is that you never *have* to go there or read anything. It’s a global river of news that floats by endlessly, and you have the option to stick your toe in every now and then, or to wade in neck deep as I have done:-)

 

 

 

 




Amplify

BitCoin Could Help You Take Back Control of Your Money

BitCoin Could Help You Take Back Control of Your Money
BitCoin Could Help You Take Back Control of Your Money

If you don’t think people are angry about the control of our financial system by rich people, rapists, and/or central bankers, think again. This weekend’s arrest of Dominique Strauss- Kahn for sexually molesting a chambermaid, on the heels of Matt Taibbi’s latest piece on Goldman Sachs, is the tip of an iceberg, most of which is already in place underwater where it can’t be seen. The aggregation of great wealth in the hands of the few never fails to make the many mad. The slaves will eventually revolt.

And guess who is quietly leading the revolt? The nerds — the only people smart enough to get revenge.

About five years ago, Robert Scoble, Thomas Hawk, Kristopher Tate and I were sitting around talking about Zoomr, and Robert suggested monetizing it with virtual currency.  At the time, virtual currency was relatively new, used mostly in Asia and by online games and virtual worlds like Second Life. Even then I liked the idea of virtual currency, because Facebook was also using it for gifts. And then, for no apparent reason, Facebook phased it out and I stopped thinking about it.

Jason Calacanis’ excellent interview with the technical lead of the open source virtual currency project BitCoin brought this subject back to mind. BitCoin is peer-to-peer currency. No government controls it, and it is completely decentralized. Like all currency systems, its value is determined by the belief system held by owners of the currency. You can download BitCoin software and it will allow you to exchange money via your computer. The transactions are not traceable; they are all anonymous. The value of a BitCoin right now is about $6.50 (although it may have fluctuated since I heard about it). You can make Bitcoins on a computer, but it takes a lot of processing power, and for the average Joe to make one would take about five years of continuous computer processing. However, the “professional” makers of BitCoins have bigger, better machines and can turn them out faster. There will, however, always be a limited supply, which is a guarantee of value.

Think about it:

Bitcoin promises to change the way we think about two important aspects of money in the digital domain:

1. It gives participants the option to opt out of their government’s monetary policy. Bitcoin is immune to government manipulation.
2. It restores anonymity to transactions. Bitcoins cannot be tracked. There is no central server to take down.

The link between money and identity enables the government to monitor your behavior and enforce a range of laws including compliance with tax codes, gambling statutes, drug laws, money laundering laws and more. Bitcoin presents the option to avoid these regulations.

Big financial clearinghouses like Visa, Mastercard, and American Express serve as the government’s minions, happy to enforce government policy while raking in the profit off of every transaction.  Even PayPal dances to the government tune.  These companies won’t play nicely with Bitcoin.  In fact, PayPal has already shut down the accounts of individuals trying to “exchange” bitcoins for real money [ see http://coinpal.ndrix.com/ ].

When the government decides it doesn’t like what you are doing, its financial minions act swiftly to enforce the rules. In December, PayPal, Mastercard and Visa shut down donations to Wikileaks, strangling the project’s finances.

Last year it was Wikileaks.  This year, who knows what company or web site will fall afoul of a sprawling government bureaucracy hooked on secrecy?

 

I am told that Bitcoin is already used in drug transactions and other illegal transactions where money doesn’t want to be traced.  But there are plenty of other less salacious uses for it. Another proponent of currency innovation, Aaron Greenspan, the creator of Face Cash, has written on Quora in response to California’s new Money Transmission Act, which seeks to control financial innovation in the state:

  • We need regulation that controls abuses by large conglomerates, such as international banks, not startups that might compete with those banks.
  • The state-by-state money transmission legal infrastructure keeps interchange prices high. Centralization of the infrastructure at the federal level would help encourage competition, thereby lowering prices.
  • Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Discover should not be given a government-sanctioned monopoly on electronic payments.

As I start to study what’s possible in terms of currency innovation, I can’t help thinking that this segment of society, too, like the record business and health care, and politics, is due for a dose of transparency and disruption. Peer to peer currency, like BitCoin, is both an old and a novel idea. I will be fascinated:-)




Amplify

Microsoft Bought Skype for Kinect

Microsoft Bought Skype for Kinect

Did Microsoft Buy Skype for Kinect?

I own an XBox Kinect, I subscribe to XBox Live. But that’s where it stops for me because I am a user. However, sitting with two far more technical friends of mine in Half Moon Bay, I learn two interesting facts: Microsoft intends to correct the resolution problems with the Kinect soon, probably by releasing a new version for the enterprise, and Mr.Softie has already released an SDK so developers can build real applications for the Kinect platform.

No longer is Microsoft’s official position toward hacking the Kinect permissive. Things are tightening down with the release of the SDK. Something is happening in the company, probably because Steve Ballmer feels he now has a “modern” product he can build on as Windows goes gently into its good night.

Therefore, Mike Slinn ( http://www.mslinn.com) Ian McGee (http://twitter.com/imcgee) and I have jumped to a conclusion: Microsoft bought Skype so it could use Kinect for videoconferencing and compete with Cisco. We were in Peet’s and it was morning, so this isn’t a drunken fantasy.

Cisco’s Telepresence is successful, but very pricey. And GotoMeeting won’t play on my big screen TV. There’s a market out there, especially for a solution you can control with gestures.

Couldn’t Microsoft take Skype with its large free consumer user base, and Kinect with it’s large paying consumer user base, and blend them with improved video resolution into something everyone wants to use and pay for? Startups who want to talk to far-flung development teams, grandmas who want to talk to grandchildren, salesmen who want to demo to clients? On the big-screen TV that is becoming useless anyway? If we just had better control, with finger-level resolution, wouldn’t this be a cool new product? One that would propel Microsoft into the future?

Anyway, we concocted this theory, and it could be in Ballmer’s mind. Of course he would have to “invest” that kind of dough to keep anyone else from grabbing Skype and producing a competitor. I hope this means someone has defrosted Microsoft from its cryogenically frozen state in time to win again.




Amplify

Argentina, Wences Casares, and the Big Beef

Argentina, Wences Casares, and the Big Beef

UPDATE: I have received many comments from offended Argentinians who think my view of their country is racist. Please understand before you read that the first half of the review is what was presented to us by a tour guide who drove us around on a bus.  It’s not mine. Personally, I had a fabulous time in Argentina meeting very hard working entrepreneurs and  eating excellent food. We had a great hostess in Vanesa, and we had a going home barbecue at a castle outside Buenos Aires. In no way did I experience what the tour guide was talking about, nor do I think it is Argentina. Rather, I believe it is one man’s attempt at standup comedy.

 

Geeks on a Plane (http://www.geeksonaplane.com) might better be called Geeks on a bus, because once we hit a country, we go to all our events by bus  in a big group. At any given time, there may be 30-50 of us (some travelers don’t go to all the cities) visiting a city, sharing best practices and trying to help as best we can.

 

In Buenos Aires, our bus guide is a cynic. He is hilarious as he tells us the unvarnished truth about his country. He tells us Argentinians have the “social plan,” which gives them free health care and a stipend large enough to dissuade many from working. Argentina also has professional protesters, who are paid well to live in shanty towns and show up with banners. The driver is both entertaining and transparent, but you can see he is proud of the quirks of his country, if not of its government. In fact, he calls the Argentinian president “Christina.”

Argentinians seem never to be able to get it together. They build ports with docks too narrow for boats — and abandon them. (in Buenos Aires there’s the new Puerto Madera next to the traditional Boca neighborhood port from the 19th century.)  They start to build universities and don’t complete all the buildings when the economy sours. They lose money in their own banks and then by investing in American currency, They’ve been in an economic downturn since their “crash of 2002.” They spend a ton of money on death: the biggest tourist attraction in town is La Recoleta, the cemetary in which Eva Peron is buried.

 

Argentina loses at soccer, and in wars. Its dogs, living in high rises and walking on leashes, look depressed. Everyone dines late and sleeps till noon. On my way to Starbucks, I passed a laundromat that had been broken into the night before, even though It had a protective corrugated metal grate in front. Robbers had cut the grate,smashed the window behind it, and marched in.

 

We were also told  not to carry our passports, and to remember the numbers on bills we hand to cab drivers, as the driver will often take your bill and hand it back to you asking for something smaller. What he hands back to you will be counterfeit!

And the people eat beef! Lots and lots of beef. I ate more beef in a week in Latin America than I eat in a year at home.

And yet 500 people show up to an event on Friday night to hear Wenceslao Casares, Argentinian founder of BlingNation (http://www.BlingNation.com) and Dave McClure of 500 Startups (http://www.500startups.com) in Silicon Valley talk about entrepreneurship. They couldn’t be less like what the driver has told us. Here, as everywhere we go, entrepreneurs are a bright spot

 

Buenos Aires has software development companies to which companies in America outsource. Globant, one of the companies that hosted GeeksonaPlane,(http://www.GeeksonaPlane.com) is one such contract development company. Like Brazil and Chile, Argentina also has the not-for-profit Endeavor Program, which supports high impact founders who want to create improvements in infrastructure for their countries.

 

The center of Argentina’s entrepreneurial community appears to be The Universidad de san Andres, outside Buenos Aires.  Wences, probably Argentina’s most successful new-generation entrepreneur, attended there on scholarship. The son of a sheepherder in Patagonia, he is the founder of BlingNation (http://www.BlingNation.com) a mobile payments platform, and of several other financial services companies that service Latin America.

 

The GeeksonaPlane (http://www.geeksonaplane.com) group spent an afternoon at the university,listening to a group of startups focused on the Latin American market: a cloud service provider, a safe Internet solution for kids, an event planner, a few smaller ideas. The strongest of these,  Eventioz, (http://www.eventioz.com), already has 800 customers, and needs money to scale further because it must adapt to different currency conditions and payment processing systems in Latin American countries.

 

Most of these startups are very brave: they are targeting their own countries, or small businesses that aren’t served by the market leaders in their spaces They’re walking before they run because they are the first people in their country to try things that aren’t agriculture, ranching, or natural resources.

 

But they will succeed, just as Chinese startups succeed, because Spanish is the third most spoken language in the world, and Spanish speakers are an underserved online market.

 




Amplify

Wake Up USA: Obama Needs a Program Like Startup Chile

Wake Up USA: Obama Needs a Program Like Startup Chile

On a Chilean freeway, being transported by bus from Santiago to Santa Cruz,  Geeks on a Plane hears startup pitches from companies being accelerated by Endeavor, a global nonprofit accelerator for entrepreneurs  with a social purpose.  These entrepreneurs are trying to turn Chile solar, purify water, design solar cars. Endeavor is active throughout Latin America; in Brazil, I met an Endeavor-sponsored entrepreneur whose company brings copper-wire broadband solutions to small communities,

But here is the heart of the story We had already breakfasted with Chilean president Sebastian Pinera (@SebastianPinera on Twitter).

Last night, we attended First Tuesday Santiago to see startups and hear pitches. There are startups everywhere, which is why we’re on the bus  heading for a lunchtime wine tasting and a talk by the founder of Vertical, an adventure tour company that has partnered with National Geographic to guide groups up Mount Everest and down to Antartica.
  
That’s because the Chilean government, under President Pinera, has taken a bold step: It has started an accelerator called Startup Chile, which will bring  100 entrepreneurs with big ideas to Chile to start companies. The founders get a stipend, expenses, and the attention of the Chilean government. Last night I met a member of the first cohort, Georges Cadena, who is trying to build a plant in Chile for holographic technology that can be used in windows to cut the cost of solar installations in half. He moved to Chile from California. And a Chilean woman from the Bay Area who moved back to co-found a private equity firm for Chilean wineries. Of 23 companies in the initial cohort, 8 will be remaining in Chile.

The people I meet think it’s a lousy time to be in the States, with its stagnant economy, group depression, and loss of focus on what immigrants brought to America.

Many of them  believed in America, they went to America for college or jobs, but  they didn’t see the American dream or the promised land that previous generations saw. So they turned around and came home. Over half the first "class" of Startup Chile are Americans

They are being treated like royalty. President Pinera told his audience this morning that Chile may have been late to the industrial revolution, but it won’t be late to the information revolution. He plans to do everything in his power to change the culture to one tolerant of risk, not afraid to fail and learn from mistakes. He told us Adam and Eve may have been the first entrepreneurs when they ate the forbidden fruit.

For a politician, he "gets it," and he is putting his money where his
mouth is by funding these young companies. Chile may yet produce the first solar car.

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode