Monthly Archives: March 2010

Aurora Loan Services Saga, Part 3

Aurora Loan Services Saga, Part 3
After I got all the comments on my last blog post, I got frightened that I would be thrown out of the loan modification program and then would be in foreclosure for not making the payments of the original loan while I was making those of the modification program. Several desperate people wrote me that had happened to them. So I did what I always do: I asked.And I got what I consider an honest answer. The servicers are caught between needing to get people immediate relief and needing to get the modifications underwritten. They are, after all, still loans. So people like Aurora chose to give immediate relief through temporary modification without verified income. That made people think they were “in” — until they submitted their documents and found they were “out.”

So it backfired on the servicers, because it appeared to be a betrayal. The news media doesn’t cover stuff like this, but people need to know:


..the program guidelines… have recently changed in a way that will limit what you describe from happening.


First, current program guidelines. The program currently permits servicers to start trial payment plans on the basis of verbal income information provided by the borrower. Many, if not most, servicers chose this option because it provided immediate payment relief, subject to verification of income and full underwriting. The other option requires borrowers to submit complete documentation for underwriting prior to starting a payment plan.


In the case of trials based on stated income, if the documentation subsequently submitted by the borrower is different, and the person is no longer eligible, they would in fact be reported as delinquent as required by the program.  Note that the income can be too high (specifically, the housing to income ratio is below 31% already), or too low (frequently the case in the case of someone who has lost their job in the interim). In addition, the program required certain other data to be refreshed if aged greater than 90 days, which could also result in not being approved.


So, the scenario you describe does in fact occur. Recently, the Administration changed  the rules to eliminate the stated income option, and all new borrowers will be fully underwritten prior to starting on a plan, so that if they make all payments and submit the final agreements, they are done.The deadline for conversion to the new plan is June 1.

The Treasury guidance that outlines the mandate to move to verified income is public information. I’ve linked to part of it here. Another useful document is the latest FAQ shown on the MakingHomeAffordable.gov site.

I know this may not change the outcome for me, but at least I don’t feel that I’m being buffeted by unknown forces for their own advantage. This is a typical government program: well-meaning and poorly executed on all sides.

Posted via email from Not Really Stealthmode

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Amplify